Features

Marriage in Islam (Nikāḥ)

Marriage & spousehood · Marriage & spousehood · A contract, a covenant and a public bond

Nikāḥ is at once a contract and a covenant: Islamic law builds marriage from offer, acceptance, consent and the mahr, while the Qurʾān frames it as a sign of God — a bond of affection and mercy.

At a glance

NatureA civil contract (ʿaqd) elevated by the Qurʾān to a “solemn covenant”
EssentialsOffer & acceptance, consent, mahr, witnesses (walī per most Sunni schools)
MahrThe bridal gift — her property alone (Qurʾān 4:4)
Key verse“He placed between you affection and mercy” (Qurʾān 30:21)
Also writtennikaah · mehr / meher · wali · mahar

The Qurʾān's most quoted description of marriage is a verse of cosmology, not law: among God's signs is "that He created for you spouses from among yourselves, that you may find tranquillity in them, and He placed between you affection and mercy" (30:21). The legal texture rests on that frame. A valid marriage requires offer and acceptance, the free consent of both parties, witnesses, and the mahr — a bridal gift the Qurʾān commands be given "graciously" and which remains the wife's own property (4:4). Most Sunni schools additionally require the bride's walī (guardian) to contract on her behalf, while the Ḥanafīs permit an adult woman to contract her own marriage; Shiʿi law likewise distinguishes the never-married from the previously married in the guardian's role.

The Qurʾān calls the marriage bond a mīthāq ghalīẓ — a "solemn covenant" (4:21) — the same phrase it uses for God's covenant with the prophets. Jurists therefore treated nikāḥ as a contract unlike any other: publicised rather than secret, celebrated with the walīma feast, and generating a lattice of mutual rights the spouses may not simply waive away. Consent is not a formality; the Prophet annulled marriages contracted over a woman's objection, and the schools agree that coercion invalidates the bond.

The traditions diverge on one institution: Twelver Shiʿi jurisprudence recognises mutʿa, a marriage contracted for a fixed term, holding that its Qurʾānic permission was never abrogated; Sunni schools hold that the Prophet finally prohibited it and do not recognise it. Both positions are centuries old and each tradition regards its own as settled — a difference best understood, and stated, attributively.

Related in Chronicle

Curated reference on Islamic belief and thought. On matters where traditions differ, positions are attributed rather than adjudicated; verify points of doctrine with qualified scholars.